Service Charges: The Product Metric Developers Skip
Of 86.6 million American owner-occupied households, 21.6 million pay a condo or HOA fee, with a median of US$ 135 a month, per the Census Bureau in September 2025. The running cost of shared amenities is the product metric developers never measure.
- Of the 86.6 million owner-occupied households in the United States, 21.6 million pay a condo or homeowners association fee, with a national median of US$ 135 a month and about 3 million households above US$ 500, per the Census Bureau on 11 September 2025 using 2024 American Community Survey data.
- Households with an active mortgage pay a median of US$ 120; those who own outright pay US$ 184. Lending already prices the running cost of shared amenities.
- Developers track absorption, cancellation and handover defects. None of them track the number that says whether the building they designed can be carried.
There is one metric that measures, with uncomfortable precision, whether a high-end residential building was well designed. It shows up in no developer report, no earnings deck and no product meeting. It is the service charge, five years after handover, and the share of owners who have stopped paying it.
The American data is the cleanest available, because the methodology is public and the series is long. The Census Bureau reported on 11 September 2025, drawing on the 2024 American Community Survey, that 21.6 million of the country's 86.6 million owner-occupied households pay a condo or homeowners association fee. The national median is US$ 135 a month. About 5.6 million households, 26% of those paying, are below US$ 50. At the other end, roughly 3 million pay more than US$ 500 a month, and in New York 64% of fee-paying owners sit above that line.
The most revealing line in that release is a comparison nobody designed it to make. Owners with an active mortgage pay a median fee of US$ 120. Owners who have paid off the home pay US$ 184. Buyers who need credit end up in buildings with lower charges, because underwriting already weighs the monthly fee against their capacity to pay. The running cost of a shared pool has quietly become a credit variable.
The reserve is now a lending condition
Regulation is moving the same way. According to BuildingLink on 29 September 2026, Fannie Mae raises the minimum reserve allocation from 10% to 15% of annual budgeted assessment income, applying to loan applications dated on or after 4 January 2027. A building whose owners vote to keep the charge low by starving the reserve will, from that date, be harder to finance.
The starting point is already weak. Association Reserves estimated in November 2025, as reported by MortgageResearch on 10 August 2026, that 26% of reserve funds are well funded, 40% are underfunded and 34% are severely underfunded. Those shares come from a firm that sells reserve studies, which is worth stating plainly, and they are the most frequently cited figures in the market.
Where the cost is actually decided
Every amenity added to justify the price per square metre also entered the building's monthly operating budget, with staffing, preventive maintenance, utilities, insurance and reserve funding attached. A heated pool carries a treatment contract and a gas bill. A gym carries equipment servicing and replacement cycles. A remote concierge carries a redundant connection. A rooftop carries waterproofing with an expiry date. None of it is unusual, and all of it is monthly, permanent and rising faster than general inflation.
That cost is set early, in the feasibility study, when somebody decides how many amenities the product will carry. On that table, each amenity appears twice: as a sales argument and as a construction cost. It does not appear as an operating cost, because the operating cost belongs to somebody else.
Tool for this topic
Feasibility Calculator (GSV)
Calculate gross GSV, distribute costs by phase and read the project margin. The base of any feasibility study.
Open calculator →The argument
Developers should measure the actual charge and the arrears rate of the buildings they have already delivered, over years, and use those figures as a feasibility criterion for the next one. Replace the question "how many amenities does the market expect" with "how many amenities will this building be able to pay for in 2036".
The objection arrives immediately, and it is legally sound. The owners' association is an autonomous legal entity, its meeting is sovereign, and the developer holds neither duty nor power over the budget after handover. All true, and all irrelevant to brand. The buyer does not separate the developer from the board they inherited. They attach the rising bill to the name that was on the sales gallery wall, and they repeat that association to the next buyer, who is the person setting the resale value that audits the brand. A heavy charge narrows the resale market, and a narrow resale market is the test no key visual survives.
Measuring requires no new prerogative. The management company appointed at handover already holds the data. The post-handover relationship already exists in most high-end operations. What is missing is a request for two numbers a year, per building: the effective charge per square metre, and the share of accounts more than thirty days late. Three delivered buildings and five years of history tell a developer which amenity mix its own buyers can sustain, from its own data rather than a competitor's brochure.
Publishing the estimated charge before the sale, which we covered when comparing residential developments with private clubs that publish their rules and costs before taking a payment, handles the transparency side. This is the other half: what the developer does with the number once it has become a bill. The same logic runs through the cost of longevity in a building already delivered, where the product ages alongside the resident.
A launch that drops two amenities and publishes an estimated charge 15% below the comparable building next door holds a verifiable commercial argument, one that survives a buyer's spreadsheet and a broker's conversation. A launch that adds a twelfth shared facility holds a brochure argument. The difference between them surfaces in year five, in the metric nobody tracks.
Frequently asked questions
How much do American households pay in condo and HOA fees?
The national median is US$ 135 a month, according to the Census Bureau on 11 September 2025 using 2024 American Community Survey estimates. Of 86.6 million owner-occupied households, 21.6 million pay such a fee. About 26% pay less than US$ 50 a month and roughly 3 million households pay more than US$ 500.
Why does the service charge rise faster than inflation?
Most of it is labour and contracted maintenance, the two lines that run hardest above price indices, and every shared facility adds a recurring contract. Reserve funding compounds the pressure: Association Reserves estimated in November 2025, reported by MortgageResearch on 10 August 2026, that 74% of reserve funds are underfunded or severely underfunded, which means many buildings are understating the charge rather than controlling it.
Can a developer follow a building after handover?
It can follow without interfering. The association is autonomous and its meeting sets the budget, but nothing prevents a developer from asking the management company, with the association's consent, for two annual indicators per delivered building: effective charge per square metre, and the share of accounts more than thirty days late. Those two numbers turn the next feasibility study into a decision with its own track record.
Next step
See how TBO presented the shared amenities of high-end developments in its portfolio.
See the work →Frequently asked questions
The national median is US$ 135 a month, according to the Census Bureau on 11 September 2025 using 2024 American Community Survey estimates. Of 86.6 million owner-occupied households, 21.6 million pay such a fee. About 26% pay less than US$ 50 a month and roughly 3 million households pay more than US$ 500.
Most of it is labour and contracted maintenance, the two lines that run hardest above price indices, and every shared facility adds a recurring contract. Reserve funding compounds the pressure: Association Reserves estimated in November 2025, reported by MortgageResearch on 10 August 2026, that 74% of reserve funds are underfunded or severely underfunded, which means many buildings are understating the charge rather than controlling it.
It can follow without interfering. The association is autonomous and its meeting sets the budget, but nothing prevents a developer from asking the management company, with the association's consent, for two annual indicators per delivered building: effective charge per square metre, and the share of accounts more than thirty days late. Those two numbers turn the next feasibility study into a decision with its own track record.